Christopher Hibbert's description of Prince Rupert of the Rhine, Charles I's nephew and dashing cavalry officer. Woof, woof!
"Yet Rupert was far more than a rough, handsome soldier of fortune with a taste for fancy clothes, fringed boots, feathered hats, scarlet sashes and long curled hair; he was more than a cavalry leader of undeniable skill and courage. He was highly intelligent, a remarkable linguist, an artist of uncommon merit, a man with an inventive skill and curiosity of mind that was to give as much pleasure to his later years of sickness and premature old age as the several mistresses who visited him in his rooms at Windsor Castle."
Saturday, 1 June 2019
Friday, 31 May 2019
God save the King!
Let's take a break from the medieval era for a moment, and move forward in time to a blustery summer's day in Nottingham on 22 August 1642. On that day Charles I unfurled his standard of war on the summit of the highest tower of Nottingham Castle, heralding the start of the English Civil War - or the War of the Three Kingdoms, or the British & Irish Civil Wars (delete or add to taste).
From the evidence given by eye-witnesses at the trial of the King in 1649, we learn the following particulars concerning the raising of his standard:—
"Robert Large, painter, of the town and county of Nottingham, deposed upon oath that in the summer of 1642 he painted, by command of my Lord Beaumont, the great standard of war that was placed upon the high tower of the Castle of Nottingham, and that he often saw the King thereabouts, at the same time that his standard was erected and displayed.”
"Samuel Lawson, of Nottingham, maltster, aged 30 years or thereabouts, sworn and examined, saith: That about August, 1642, he this deponent saw the King’s standard brought forth of Nottingham Castle, borne upon divers gentlemen’s shoulders, who (as the report was) were noblemen; and he saw the same carried by them on the Hill close adjoining the Castle, with a herald before it; and there the said standard was erected, with great shouting, acclamations, and sound of drums and trumpets; and that when the said standard was so erected there was a proclamation made; and that he, this deponent, saw the King present at the erecting thereof.”
We are told the standard was “a large red streamer, pennon shaped, cloven at the end, attached to a long red staff having about twenty supporters, and bore next the staff a St. George’s Cross, then an escutcheon of the Royal Arms, with a hand pointing to the crown above it, and the legend:
"GIVE UNTO CAESAR HIS DUE,"
together with two other crowns, each surmounted by a lion passant."
Three days later the royal standard was unfurled again, this time on an open field on the north side of the castle wall (now marked by a tablet). It took twenty men to carry the banner into the field, and they had to hold it upright after digging an insufficiently deep hole with daggers and knives. The royal herald made a mess of his speech, and then a strong gust of wind blew the standard down. Not a very auspicious start for the royalists.
![]() |
| Charles I |
From the evidence given by eye-witnesses at the trial of the King in 1649, we learn the following particulars concerning the raising of his standard:—
"Robert Large, painter, of the town and county of Nottingham, deposed upon oath that in the summer of 1642 he painted, by command of my Lord Beaumont, the great standard of war that was placed upon the high tower of the Castle of Nottingham, and that he often saw the King thereabouts, at the same time that his standard was erected and displayed.”
"Samuel Lawson, of Nottingham, maltster, aged 30 years or thereabouts, sworn and examined, saith: That about August, 1642, he this deponent saw the King’s standard brought forth of Nottingham Castle, borne upon divers gentlemen’s shoulders, who (as the report was) were noblemen; and he saw the same carried by them on the Hill close adjoining the Castle, with a herald before it; and there the said standard was erected, with great shouting, acclamations, and sound of drums and trumpets; and that when the said standard was so erected there was a proclamation made; and that he, this deponent, saw the King present at the erecting thereof.”
We are told the standard was “a large red streamer, pennon shaped, cloven at the end, attached to a long red staff having about twenty supporters, and bore next the staff a St. George’s Cross, then an escutcheon of the Royal Arms, with a hand pointing to the crown above it, and the legend:
"GIVE UNTO CAESAR HIS DUE,"
together with two other crowns, each surmounted by a lion passant."
Three days later the royal standard was unfurled again, this time on an open field on the north side of the castle wall (now marked by a tablet). It took twenty men to carry the banner into the field, and they had to hold it upright after digging an insufficiently deep hole with daggers and knives. The royal herald made a mess of his speech, and then a strong gust of wind blew the standard down. Not a very auspicious start for the royalists.
Labels:
action and adventure,
Britain,
British and History,
Cavaliers,
Charles I,
England,
English civil war,
Ireland,
Oliver Cromwell,
Roundheads,
Scotland,
Wales,
War and Kingship,
war and military
Adam Gurdun (continued)
The tale of Sir Adam (continued)
In 1253 Adam Gurdun is granted a reward for his military service in Poitou and Gascony: on 10 December, at Bazas in Gascony, Henry III gives him a licence for life to hunt the hare, fox, cat and badger in the forests of Southampton, but not to take the king’s great deer. The following May he is granted exemption from further service if he can find a sergeant to serve for forty days in his stead.
Adam clearly enjoys a life of soldiering. When another war breaks out in 1257, this time against the Welsh, he again serves in person. By now Adam has been drawn into the affinity of Roger Mortimer, lord of Wigmore on the Welsh March, and serves under his command. Mortimer’s contingent is part of a separate army ordered to support Humphrey Bohun, Earl of Hereford, in his command of the Marches from Montgomery to Glamorgan. Adam, therefore, is not part of the king’s army that marches from Chester to Deganwy.
King Henry gets no further as his advance is crippled by supply problems and skilful Welsh guerilla attacks. The king has unfurled his dragon banner and threatened to ‘exterminate the Welsh’; instead he is forced to retreat, ‘the inglorious king, his treasure much squandered, laughed at and mocked by the enemy’ (Matthew Paris). Henry shows considerable personal courage, riding at the head of his troops, but that cannot make up for dismal planning and the famine and disease that sweeps through his army.
Adam is having a slightly better time of it in the Middle March. His captain, Roger Mortimer, has his own objectives to pursue against Prince Llywelyn ap Gruffudd. Llywelyn has broken the Treaty of Gwrtherynion, agreed with Mortimer’s father, in which the Welsh prince swore he would never invade the Mortimer lordships of Gwrtherynion and Maelienydd. In 1256 he abjured the treaty and carried fire and sword into these lands, making a lifelong enemy of his cousins Mortimer. Bad move.
Not much is known of Mortimer’s service against the Welsh in 1257, but he seems to hold his ground. On 28 December he is given licence to fortify his town of Radnor against the Welsh, and on the following day grants an extra letter of protection to Adam Gurdun. The knight of Hampshire has survived the harrowing ordeal of war in Wales.
![]() |
| Wigmore Castle in Shropshire |
Adam clearly enjoys a life of soldiering. When another war breaks out in 1257, this time against the Welsh, he again serves in person. By now Adam has been drawn into the affinity of Roger Mortimer, lord of Wigmore on the Welsh March, and serves under his command. Mortimer’s contingent is part of a separate army ordered to support Humphrey Bohun, Earl of Hereford, in his command of the Marches from Montgomery to Glamorgan. Adam, therefore, is not part of the king’s army that marches from Chester to Deganwy.
King Henry gets no further as his advance is crippled by supply problems and skilful Welsh guerilla attacks. The king has unfurled his dragon banner and threatened to ‘exterminate the Welsh’; instead he is forced to retreat, ‘the inglorious king, his treasure much squandered, laughed at and mocked by the enemy’ (Matthew Paris). Henry shows considerable personal courage, riding at the head of his troops, but that cannot make up for dismal planning and the famine and disease that sweeps through his army.
![]() |
| Illustration of medieval soldiers, taken from the Douce Apocalpyse |
Adam is having a slightly better time of it in the Middle March. His captain, Roger Mortimer, has his own objectives to pursue against Prince Llywelyn ap Gruffudd. Llywelyn has broken the Treaty of Gwrtherynion, agreed with Mortimer’s father, in which the Welsh prince swore he would never invade the Mortimer lordships of Gwrtherynion and Maelienydd. In 1256 he abjured the treaty and carried fire and sword into these lands, making a lifelong enemy of his cousins Mortimer. Bad move.
Not much is known of Mortimer’s service against the Welsh in 1257, but he seems to hold his ground. On 28 December he is given licence to fortify his town of Radnor against the Welsh, and on the following day grants an extra letter of protection to Adam Gurdun. The knight of Hampshire has survived the harrowing ordeal of war in Wales.
Thursday, 30 May 2019
Adam Gurdun (continued)
The tale of Sir Adam (continued)
After his traumatic experience on the Poitou campaign in 1242, Adam Gurdun had a better time in Gascony a decade later. The duchy was in chaos, thanks to Simon de Montfort’s mismanagement as seneschal and the revolt of Gaston, vicomte de Béarn. This caused neighbouring princes to cast greedy eyes upon it, in particular Alfonso the Wise, King of Castile. After he succeeded his father, Ferdinand, in 1252, Alfonso renewed his dynastic claim to Gascony.
![]() |
| La Réole |
All this left Henry III with no choice but to sail to Gascony in person to sort out the mess. Adam was once again summoned to go with his king overseas. Alongside him were the likes of Ralph Bakepuz, a Derbyshire knight who would later fight against Henry’s army at Chesterfield; Humphrey de Bohun, destined to perish in the squalor of a dungeon at Beeston Castle after the battle of Evesham; Hamo Lestrange, who would marry the heiress of Beirut and die in the Holy Land; Fulk Fitzwarin, who would drown in a muddy pool at the Battle of Lewes; Roger Mortimer of Wigmore, whose successors would murder the Prince of Wales, depose Edward II and nearly depose Edward III. An interesting bunch, though I personally wouldn’t have them round for tea.
![]() |
| The duchy of Gascony |
In August 1253 the royal fleet sailed up the Gironde to Bordeaux, the chief city of Gascony. Like his father, King John, Henry could soldier when he was in the mood. He fought a determined and energetic campaign, though it took months to reduce the towns and castles of the lower Garonne and Dordogne. The diehard rebels, most of them bitter enemies of Montfort, shut themselves up behind the walls of La Réole (pictured above). Henry deprived the rebels of their allies by negotiating treaties with King Louis of France, the lord of Albret, the Counts of Comminges and Armagnac, and Gaston himself. The lords of Albret in particular would remain steadfastly loyal to the Angevin regime for decades, until they were alienated by Edward II and the rise of Piers Gaveston.
Adam Gurdun
The tale of Sir Adam.
Sir Adam Gurdun was born into a very minor landed Hampshire family. Nothing is known of his early years, except that he chose the path of a career soldier and first saw action on Henry III's campaign to recover Poitou in 1242. Adam's name appears on a long roll of knights given protection to go beyond seas with the king.
Adam had some ill-fated companions. Alongside him on the roll is Philip Basset, who suffered a billion wounds at the Battle of Lewes in 1264; Stephen Bauzan, hacked to death by the Welsh at Cymerau in 1257; Alan la Zouche, murdered by Earl Warenne in the king's presence at Westminster in 1268. There's also a man named Vassal Affoylinis, who sounds like an obscure skin disease.
Nothing is known of Adam's personal experience in Poitou, though it can't have been a happy one. Deserted by his allies, and surprised at the military aggression of the French king, Louis IX (Saint Louis), Henry's campaign ended in disaster. Adam may have got his sword wet in the skirmishes at Taillebourg and Saintes, where the English were well beaten and forced to retreat into Gascony.
Pictured above is The Battle of Taillebourg won by Saint Louis, by Eugène Delacroix (Galerie des Batailles, Palace of Versailles)
Sir Adam Gurdun was born into a very minor landed Hampshire family. Nothing is known of his early years, except that he chose the path of a career soldier and first saw action on Henry III's campaign to recover Poitou in 1242. Adam's name appears on a long roll of knights given protection to go beyond seas with the king.
Adam had some ill-fated companions. Alongside him on the roll is Philip Basset, who suffered a billion wounds at the Battle of Lewes in 1264; Stephen Bauzan, hacked to death by the Welsh at Cymerau in 1257; Alan la Zouche, murdered by Earl Warenne in the king's presence at Westminster in 1268. There's also a man named Vassal Affoylinis, who sounds like an obscure skin disease.
Nothing is known of Adam's personal experience in Poitou, though it can't have been a happy one. Deserted by his allies, and surprised at the military aggression of the French king, Louis IX (Saint Louis), Henry's campaign ended in disaster. Adam may have got his sword wet in the skirmishes at Taillebourg and Saintes, where the English were well beaten and forced to retreat into Gascony.
Pictured above is The Battle of Taillebourg won by Saint Louis, by Eugène Delacroix (Galerie des Batailles, Palace of Versailles)
Push of pike
A subtle hint as to the subject matter of my next project. Giving the Middle Ages a rest for a while...
Wednesday, 29 May 2019
Money, money, money
The development of the medieval principality of Wales under the Llywelyns:
“We can thus see that the political and military achievements of the princes were facilitated, at the very least, by substantial developments in the machinery and personnel of governance. At an even more fundamental level economic growth was also crucial to political innovation: the foundation of trading centres, boroughs and ports was a phenomenon imported into Pura Wallia from the March and beyond, and was both stimulated by, and helped to produce, a major thirteenth-century development of commutation of revenues and rents formerly rendered in kind into ones paid in cash. There were numerous flourishing marketing centres in and near the eastern and southern March in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and the importance of their trade with Wales can be judged by the quickness of the English governments to ban trade with Wales at times of Anglo-Welsh wars.” -
D Stephenson In light of the above, some difficult questions have to be asked. Why did so many Welshmen, of all ranks of society, reject Llywelyn ap Gruffudd in 1277? This was the important conflict: “It was in the war of 1282 that killed Llywelyn, but it was in the war of 1277 that he was crushed, reduced to a shadow of his former eminence”.
One reason may have been the efforts of the princes to introduce a cash economy: commutation of traditional services into money payments was viable for who produced a surplus to be sold in markets, but was a daunting prospect for the average peasant, who lived at bare subsistence level. As late as 1318, over forty years after Llywelyn’s death, the community of West Wales complained to Edward II that they ‘were never accustomed to have money in the Welshry’.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












